Citatio: D. Groddek, hethiter.net/: grodlist s.v. KUB 26.58 (v. 0.7)
Literatur zu KUB 26.58:
H. Otten, AAWL 1968,3, 15 A. 1
G. Giorgadze, AoF 25 (1998), 95 A. 2
E. von Schuler, GS Bossert, 462 A. 72
S. Heinhold-Krahmer et al., THeth 9, 256
F. Imparati, FS Houwink ten Cate, 144-145 m.A. 11
A. Goetze, JCS 11 (1957), 59 A. 75
H. Klengel, HbOr I/34, 221, 240
Th. van den Hout, StBoT 38, 163, 308
M. Giorgieri/C. Mora, Regalità, 44
A. Uchitel, JESHO 48 (2005), 481
J. Friedrich, AfO 9 (1934), 209
A. Archi, SMEA 14 (1971), 196 A. 40, 200 A. 62
F. Imparati, RHA 32 (1974), 10 A. 14
J. Garstang, JNES 3 (1944), 30 A. 72, 32 A. 78, 35 A. 88
H. Otten, RlA III, 110b s.v. Freibrief in Ḫatti
RGTC 6, 230
(= Bo 2047) A. Götze, NBr, 61
M. Weeden, StBoT 54, 49 A. 224; A. 814
V. Korošec, FS Hrozný, IV, 201
M.E. Balza, RANT 10 (2013), 12
A. Goetze, JCS 22 (1968), 48 m.A. 33
O. Soysal, ArchAn 1 (1995), 148 A. 54, 149 A. 59
A. Uchitel, Diss., 150
Vs. 1ff. H. Otten, ZA 61 (1971), 234
Vs. 1 F. Imparati, FS Houwink ten Cate, 145 A. 15
Vs. 1 W. Eisele, Diss., 59
Vs. 1a HW2 I, 281a
I 1 E. Laroche, Rec., 21
Vs. 1ff. J. Glocker, AoF 38,2 (2011[2012]), 259 A. 28.35
I 1-4 J.M. Pringle, Diss., 56
Vs. 1 E. Laroche, NH, 66
2a H. Otten, AAWL 1975,1, 34
Vs. 2 H. Gonnet, Hethitica 3 (1979), 50
2a H. Gonnet, Hethitica 3 (1979), 71
Vs. 2a HW2 I, 568b
2a E. Laroche, Rec., 34
I 3 H. Gonnet, Hethitica 3 (1979), 45
I 3 M. Weeden, StBoT 54, A. 921
I 3 M. Weeden, StBoT 54, A. 921
4a A. Ünal, THeth 3, 114 A. 16
Vs. 4 F. Imparati, FS Houwink ten Cate, 145 A. 15
Vs. 4 H. Gonnet, Hethitica 3 (1979), 35
Vs. 4 H. Ertem, AÜDTCFY 230, 81
Vs. 4 RGTC 6, 230
I 4 E. Laroche, Rec., 20
I 4a.6 E. Laroche, Rec., 24
Vs. 4 A.M. Polvani, GS Quattordio Moreschini, 323
I 4a.6.II 2 E. Laroche, RHA 13 (1955), 94
Vs. 4 E. Laroche, NH, 66
Vs. 4a.Rs. 2 E. Laroche, NH, 85
Vs. 5a J. Boley, IBS 97, u.q. 371b
Vs. 5.2a A. Archi, OA 12 (1973), 216 A. 51
Vs. 5 F. Pecchioli Daddi, Mestieri, 518
5a H. Gonnet, Hethitica 3 (1979), 55
Vs. 5-7 A. Archi, SMEA 14 (1971), 203 A. 69
Vs. 5.6.4a.Rs. 2 M. Marizza, Kaskal 7 (2010), 92
Vs. 5 F. Pecchioli Daddi, FS Archi, 240
Vs. 5 HW2 I, 568b
Vs. 5-13 K. Özcan/G. Karauğuz, 7. IKH, Bd. II, 585 A. 27
5a E. Laroche, NH, 198
Vs. 6.4a.Rs. 2 F. Imparati, FS Laroche, 173 A. 25
Vs. 6-7 Th. van den Hout, DMOA 25, 230
Vs. 6.14.22.25.37.Rs. 4a Th. van den Hout, StBoT 38, 157
I 6.14.25.27 E. Laroche, Rec., 24
Vs. 6.Rs. 4a O. Soysal, CollAn 11 (2012), 315
Vs. 6-7.Rs. 4a O. Soysal, NABU 2011/III, Nr. 62, p. 69
Vs. 6.14.25.27.4a E. Laroche, NH, 198
I 7 J.V. García Trabazo, Diss., 337 A. 19
Vs. 7-8 H.A. Hoffner, JAOS 120 (2000), 71
I 7 E. Laroche, RHA 19 (1961), 28
I 7 A. Archi, SMEA 14 (1971), 190
Vs. 7-8 J. Puhvel, HED IV, 44
Vs. 8 F. Imparati, JESHO 25 (1982), 227 A. 5
Vs. 8 H. Otten, FS Güterbock, 249
Vs. 8-12 R.H. Beal, THeth 20, 57, 435
Vs. 8-13 F. Imparati, FS Houwink ten Cate, 149
Vs. 8-12 R. Haase, ZAR 2 (1996), 137
Vs. 8.12-13 CHD P, 287b-288a
Vs. 8-13 CHD Š, 5b
Vs. 8-13 F. Imparati, RHA 32 (1974), 22
Vs. 8 F. Imparati, RHA 32 (1974), 106
Vs. 8ff. HW2 I, 255a
Vs. 8ff. HW2 III/1, 336b
(= Bo 2047) Vs. 8ff. A. Götze, NBr, 54/55
Vs. 8 J. Tischler, HEG II, 695
I 8-12 J. Tischler, HEG IV, 69/70, 467
Vs. 9 H. Kronasser, EHS, 335
Vs. 9 F. Imparati, JESHO 25 (1982), 228 A. 7
Vs. 9ff. L. Zuntz, Scongiuri, 528
Vs. 9 A. Kammenhuber, Arier, 84
Vs. 9 F. Imparati, RHA 32 (1974), 57 m.A. 36, 65, 107
Vs. 9-10 F. Imparati, RHA 32 (1974), 107
Vs. 9 HW2 I, 632a
(= Bo 2047) Vs. 9 A. Götze, NBr, 62
Vs. 9 M. Weeden, StBoT 54, 216
Vs. 9.10.12 J. Tischler, HEG IV, 190
I 9-12 J. Tischler, HEG IV, 361
Vs. 10 E. Neu, GS Kronasser, 130
Vs. 10 S. Alp, HBM, 316
I 10 F. Starke, StBoT 41, 26 A. 67
Vs. 10 H. Ertem, Flora, 7
Vs. 10 H.Th. Bossert, AfO 18 (1957/58), 365
Vs. 10 HW2 III/1, 58a
(= Bo 2047) Vs. 10 A. Götze, NBr, 61
Vs. 10 A. Goetze, JCS 2 (1948), 152
I 10 H. Pedersen, Hitt., 178
I 11 J. Tischler, HEG I, 513
Vs. 11 H. Ertem, Flora, 123 A. 1
(= Bo 2047) Vs. 11 A. Götze, NBr, 50 A. 3
Vs. 11 J. Puhvel, HED IV, 91
Vs. 12 J. Puhvel, HED I/II, 119
Vs. 13 J. Puhvel, HED V, 131
Vs. 14-17 F. Pecchioli Daddi, Eothen 4, 36
Vs. 14-15 CHD L/N, 277b
Vs. 14-17 F. Imparati, RHA 32 (1974), 98 A. 153
Vs. 14-17 F. Imparati, RHA 32 (1974), 99
Vs. 14ff. V. Korošec, FS Hrozný, IV, 201 A. 79
Vs. 14-20 M. Weeden, AAS 18 (2013), 26
Vs. 15 C. Kühne/H. Otten, StBoT 16, 31
Vs. 15 J. Catsanicos, Faute, 28 A. 4
Vs. 15 CHD P, 380b
Vs. 15 J. Glocker, AoF 38,2 (2011[2012]), 264 A. 51
Vs. 16 E. Neu, GS Kronasser, 123
Vs. 16ff. F. Sommer/A. Falkenstein, HAB, 181
Vs. 16ff. F. Imparati, RHA 32 (1974), 96
Vs. 16 J. Tischler, HEG III, 479
Vs. 16 J. Puhvel, Aramazd 6/2 (2011), 70
Vs. 16 S. Alp, JCS 6 (1952), 96 A. 27
I 16 J. Friedrich, ZA 43 (1936), 292 A. 2
Vs. 16 J. Puhvel, IBS 143, 123
Vs. 16 J. Puhvel, HED VII, 7
Vs. 17 H.A. Hoffner, FS T. Özgüç, 202 A. 40
Vs. 17 F. Imparati, RHA 32 (1974), 97, 101, 102
Vs. 17f. HW2 I, 174b
Vs. 17 V. Korošec, FS Hrozný, IV, 201
Vs. 18-19 H.A. Hoffner, JCS 24 (1971/72), 33 A. 16
Vs. 18-22 CHD P, 290a
Vs. 18f. M. Ciantelli, Mat.heth.Thes. 8 (Nr. 6), 112
Vs. 19.25 HW2 I, 112b
Vs. 19-20 J.M. Pringle, Diss., 405 A. 89
Vs. 20 A. Goetze/E.H. Sturtevant, Tunnawi, 71
Vs. 21ff. P. Cotticelli-Kurras, THeth 18, 68
Vs. 21-24 A. Archi, SMEA 14 (1971), 210 A. 79
Vs. 21f. HW2 I, 367a
Vs. 21-22.24-25 J. Puhvel, HED I/II, 188
Vs. 22.25 E. Laroche, RHA 23 (1965), 45
Vs. 22.25 H.C. Melchert, CLL, 33
Vs. 22.25 HW2 I, 366b
Vs. 24 P. Cotticelli-Kurras, THeth 18, 67
Vs. 27ff. J. Glocker, AoF 36 (2009), 150 A. 10
Rs. 1ff. A. Archi, FS Otten, 19 A. 12
Rs. 1a.3a L. Zuntz, Diss., 31
Rs. 1a L. Zuntz, Diss., 112
Rs. 1a-3a CHD P, 320b
Rs. 1a J. Tischler, HEG II, 582
Rs. 2a CAD A/I, 76b
Rs. 2a M. Weeden, StBoT 54, 139, 435
Rs. 3 A. Kammenhuber, THeth 19/II, 458
Rs. 4a-5a Ph.H.J. Houwink ten Cate, FS Güterbock, 148
Rs. 4 HW2 III/1, 240a
Rs. 5a H.C. Melchert, FS Herzenberg, 92 A. 7
Rs. 6f. A. Archi, OA 12 (1973), 209 A. 2
Rs. 14ff. J.M. González Salazar, Aula Orientalis 12 (1994), 174 A. 115
Gerfrid G.W. Müller -- 2008- 2024